Tom Paris vs Radu Mihai Papoe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jul at 12:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Paris vs R. Mihai Papoe

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Paris 1 - 0 Papoe
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tom Paris winning 2 and Radu Mihai Papoe winning 1. The last match between Tom Paris and Radu Mihai Papoe was at the Brasov Challenger, 04-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 6-2 5-7 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paris | 1 |
| Papoe | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Brasov Challenger(07-04-25)
T. Paris vs R. M. Papoe H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,020 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.14% (107-68) | Career Total W/L | 68.42% (143-66) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Paris vs R. M. Papoe Match Preview:
- In recent months, Paris has demonstrated superior second serve performance, winning 45.84% of points compared to Papoe's 42.13%.
- Is there an advantage in the return game? Yes, Paris leads with a 45.68% win rate on opponents' second serve returns, while Papoe trails slightly at 42.92%.
- When breaking down first serve returns, Papoe edges out Paris, winning 32.36% versus Paris's 24.06%—a crucial statistic that may sway the match in Papoe's favor.
- Under pressure, specifically on breakpoints, Paris shows resilience, saving 56.46% compared to Papoe's 51.49%.
- Over the past year, both players have similar match win rates: Papoe at 65.63% and Paris at 63.77%.
- Both players excel on hard courts; however, Papoe boasts a better win percentage at 71%, slightly higher than Paris's 60%.
- In $10K tournaments, Paris has a higher win percentage (70.73%) compared to Papoe (63.16%).
- What about the competition level? Papoe's opponents have had a higher average rank (331.5) than those faced by Paris (415.77).
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Paris has a favorable record, winning 67% of those sets compared to 50% by Papoe.
- Who has the advantage in converting breakpoints? Papoe is more proficient, converting 34.69% of opportunities, compared to Paris's 29.27%.
Editorial Prediction (July 4, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance data reveals that Paris has a slight edge in second serve points and resilience under breakpoints, potentially giving them the upper hand during crucial moments in the match.
Papoe, however, displays a stronger break point conversion rate and excels in first serve return points, which might disrupt Paris's momentum and provide strategic advantages.
Considering both players' recent form, level of competition faced, and performance under pressure, the match appears to be highly competitive.
Despite Papoe's proficiency in breaking serve, Paris's stronger competition record and proficiency in deciding sets suggest they have a slightly higher likelihood of securing victory in this encounter.
Tom Paris vs Radu Mihai Papoe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Paris vs R. M. Papoe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:33:16 | Average Match Time | 2:33:16 |
| 62% (57/92) | 1st Serve % | 72% (68/95) |
| 68% (39/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (41/68) |
| 43% (15/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 83% (5/6) |
| 44% (42/95) | Return Points Win % | 41% (38/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Paris Recent Matches Played
R. M. Papoe Recent Matches Played

T. Paris vs R. M. Papoe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.14% (107/68) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.42% (143/66) |
| 58.46% (235/167) | Sets Win/Loss | 65.38% (304/161) |
| 52.81% (2061/1842) | Games Win/Loss | 57.34% (2366/1760) |
| 65.45% (36/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 71.43% (5/2) |
| 54.05% (20/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.71% (112/51) |
| 61.45% (51/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (26/13) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 901 | Aces Total | 148 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 436 | Total Double Faults | 202 |
| 1:30:39 | Average Match Time | 1:19:33 |
| 434.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 383.77 |
| 60% (6445/10661) | 1st Serve % | 68% (6946/10175) |
| 73% (4722/6445) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (4391/6946) |
| 52% (2199/4216) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1718/3229) |
| 42% (389/932) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (639/1293) |
| 38% (4016/10657) | Return Points Win % | 46% (4743/10311) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.00% (26/24) | Challenger W/L | 65.38% (17/9) |
| 65.57% (80/42) | Futures W/L | 68.85% (126/57) |
| 61% (106/173) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (140/206) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 59% (35/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (20/35) |
| 60% (31/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (27/46) |
| 85% (109/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (134/125) |
| 15% (109/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (134/9) |
| 21% (66/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (75/18) |